THE TRUTH  ABOUT THE IMMIGRANT FAMILIES AT THE BORDER

By Christopher Kerosky

There is so much misinformation about the asylum seekers coming to our Mexican border, including a plethora of “alternative facts” put forth by Donald Trump. 

Our office has represented many families who went through the same process like those incarcerated at the border now and so I will try to address here some of the most common fallacies and provide some accurate information.  It’s important that the public understand why this is happening and who is to blame for a policy of separating children from their parents in our name.   

Are these immigrants all coming in illegally?

No, a large portion of these refugees are entering the U.S. border legally, seeking asylum through a legal procedure established by the U.S, by statute in 1980, and in accordance with the UN Human Rights Treaty.  This is true of all of those coming in the caravans of desperate refugees from Central America, organized by humanitarian organizations.  Donald Trump has condemned these caravans, but the fact is these people are following our own laws that provide a procedure for refugees to seek asylum at our border.

According to the Washington Post, some of the others who have been separated from their children were also seeking asylum but were apprehended because they went to the wrong port of entry or crossed the border in desperation when they were turned away at a port of entry.   

The majority of those seeking asylum are from Mexico, Honduras and El Salvador, all countries ravaged by violence at the hands of criminal organizations.  Extortion, kidnappings and even murder are very common in many of the areas from which these refugees come.  Virtually all of the asylum seekers I’ve met reported that their families were targets of this violence and were threatened with more violence if they stayed in their communities.

Are these immigrants able to stay forever in the U.S. just by coming to the border?

No, all applicants for asylum have to go through a rigorous interview process to establish they have a credible fear of persecution in their home country before they are ever allowed to leave the custody of the border officials.

Those who fail these interviews are deported. 

Those who succeed in proving to a DHS official that they credible fear of persecution still have to go through a trial before an immigration judge in deportation proceedings.  There, they are subject to a higher standard of proof, requiring that they prove have a well-founded fear of persecution based on religion, race, nationality, political opinion or social group; if they fail to prove this to a judge, they are deported.

Are the Democrats responsible for this family separation policy?

Donald Trump continues to falsely blame Democrats for an administration policy that has led to more than 2,000 children being separated from their parents at the U.S. border.

The family separations began earlier this year after the Administration announced a so-called “zero tolerance” policy of referring all border crossings for federal criminal prosecution, which leads to children being separated as their parents are sent to jail.

A law intended to protect children from trafficking was  passed by a Democratic Congress and signed into law by George W. Bush in 2008.  It establishes certain due process rights for unaccompanied minors .  That is apparently the law Donald Trump is referring to; however that law does just the opposite. 

Isn’t there an alternative to incarcerating them and separating them from their children?

Yes, even if the U.S. government insists on criminally prosecuting all these immigrants, I believe these families could be given electronic ankle bracelets or other devices commonly used by immigration or law enforcement to ensure a person will attend future court hearings and not disappear. 

There has never been an adequate explanation from the Trump Administration why these refugees cannot be given electronic devices to track their whereabouts, instead of incarcerating them at greater cost to our government, not to mention the cost to their children who are taken away from them.