SEEKING ASYLUM:
Part Two: Applying for Asylum in Court.
By Christopher
Kerosky
[This article was published in La Voz
Bilingual Newspaper, http://www.lavoz.us.com/Read_La_Voz.html]
This is the second installment in a series about the
asylum process for the many citizens of Mexico and Central America coming to
our U.S. border to seek refuge from violence and persecution. That first step, covered last month, is the
interview conducted by an asylum officer at the border. This article will describe the second step –
the immigration court process.
In order to stay in the United States (and eventually permanent residency),
asylum seekers must prove to an Immigration Judge that they have a “well
founded fear” that they will be persecuted if they were forced to return to
their countries of origin.
The applicant needs to demonstrate that he or she has a fear of future
persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or
membership to a particular social group.
To obtain such protection from U.S. authorities, the asylum applicant
should prepare an application known as I-589, and file it before an Immigration
Judge. The application should include
declarations from the applicant and other witnesses and other detailed
information as to why the applicant fears returning to his home country. All of the information should be true; otherwise,
the immigrant can be accused of presenting a “frivolous” application, which
carries serious penalties.
The chances of obtaining asylum are greater if the application is filed
within one year (365 days) from the applicant's entry into the United States.
If this is not possible, then the applicant needs to demonstrate that the delay
in the filing was due to extraordinary circumstances or that that the
application was filed within a reasonable time after a change of circumstances
that make the applicant eligible for asylum.
The asylum process could take approximately from six months to six
years, depending on the judge's calendar and the backlog in the courts
generally. I have been representing
clients in asylum proceedings since 1988 and over the years, I’ve handled more
than 1000 asylum cases. Over that time,
the length of time asylum applicants wait for a hearing has steadily increased,
recently averaging about 5 years. However,
the Trump Administration is attempting to increase the number of judges and
expedite the process, especially for new applicants.
At the end of the immigration court case, a trial is held before a judge
where the applicant is able to give testimony and present evidence favorable to
his or her case. After the asylum applicant presents their case, the
government's attorney is given the opportunity to convince the judge that the
applicant is not eligible for asylum in the United States. Normally, the judge renders
a decision at the end of such hearing.
If the judge denies the request for asylum, the applicant may appeal the
decision with the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and thereafter before the federal
Court of Appeals. During the time the
appeals are pending, the applicant can remain in the U.S. legally.
If the judge decides to grant the individual asylum, he or she can
remain in the United States indefinitely. One year after being granted asylum,
the applicant and their qualified relatives can apply for Permanent Residency.
The asylum process is often long, complicated and stressful. Despite some common misconceptions to the
contrary, it is generally very difficult for asylum seekers to stay in this country. However, if they present their case well,
asylum seekers can often succeed in convincing a judge that they deserve refuge
from the growing violence and persecution in Mexico and Central America.